セキュリティ・チェック

The worst movie of 2024

I know that sounds like hyperbole, but Carry-on truly is one the dumbest most asinine movies ever made. The movie is completely devoid of any logic and sense. The plot is idiotic to say the least and the same can be said for everything done by the characters.

I know movies can take artistic freedoms some times, but when you have among other equally brain dead moments scenes of gunshots in airport bathrooms, inside airplanes and stabbings in the middle of busy airport lobbies and nobody somehow magically notices this nor is at all worried about this or the TSA agent acting all erratically you are acting a bit too much of the viewer. I have to say I did have to laugh at how surreal and stupid the scene is where the lead's girlfriend is talking to him in the middle of a airport lobby and a big old red dot appears smack on her forehead and nobody notices anything.

Trust me you don't want to watch this movie. 2024 has been a terrible year for movies, but Carry-on is my nomination for the worst movie of 2024 with zero redeeming factors.

**Stay away, you have been warned!**

This movie was so absurd that I felt compelled to write this review to warn others.

From start to finish, it’s a series of implausible and downright ridiculous events. The portrayal of airport security in particular is laughably unrealistic. I hardly know where to begin, but here are just a few examples: there’s a gunfire incident in the airport bathroom that somehow goes unnoticed, a TSA officer is stabbed in a public area with no reaction from anyone, and a random guy drives his van around the airport like it’s his personal property. These are just a few of the endless, nonsensical scenes that will leave you shaking your head in disbelief.

To make matters worse, the protagonist makes one frustratingly foolish decision after another, leaving you more annoyed than invested. It’s almost as if the movie is determined to test your patience at every turn.

This is, without a doubt, the dumbest movie of the year. It doesn’t deserve more than 1 star, and I’m baffled that it has a rating above 6—it’s a joke. Save yourself the frustration and skip this one.

Jaume Collet-Serra’s "Carry On" is a holiday action thriller that blends sharp direction, engaging storytelling, and great performances. The movie’s attention to detail is exceptional, with every scene serving a purpose. Its tightly woven plot moves briskly, delivering compelling twists without unnecessary fluff. This refreshing approach ensures an engaging experience.

Egerton’s performance stands out, portraying a mix of vulnerability and tenacity that makes Ethan relatable. Jason Bateman excels as the chilling antagonist. The emotional depth brought by Collet-Serra’s direction ensures you’re invested in the characters. The cinematography adds to the tension, with creative shots and dynamic angles enhancing the airport setting. Memorable scenes and immersive visuals elevate the story, making the film a visual treat.

"Carry On" balances its thrills with genuine emotion, offering a gripping, high-stakes narrative about choices and resilience. It’s a smart, thrilling ride that’s well worth the time.

This guy is so dumb. This movie is so long. I suppose you could take a drink every time a gotcha moment happens. That could get you quite drunk and maybe then you'd not care about how dumb it is. Strong drinks.

It's fine though. Lots of neat phone calls and shots of surveillance.

Worst film in the franchise. I mean, where are Sid James’ laugh, Kenneth Williams’ innuendos, and Hattie Jacques’ stern glare?

<em>'Carry-On'</em> is a movie that gave me the required entertainment, I found it all to be extremely watchable. There are one or two moments within the first hour that had me questioning how they were going to stretch interest for events onscreen for just short of two hours, but pleasantly they most certainly do.

Taron Egerton and Jason Bateman give excellent performances, I think even without just one or the other the film wouldn't work as nicely - they are the keys to its success, for me. That's not to say it's a production that only relies on its acting talent, because this felt well written; they make the predicament/actions of the characters justified.

I have no doubt that the film uses plenty of artistic licence, as per with movies, but that's something I have zero issue with - as long as it makes the plot more enjoyable, which most definitely is the case here in my opinion. Going back to the cast, nice to see Dean Norris involved; Danielle Deadwyler and Theo Rossi are positives as well.

Best way to sum this up: <em>'Die Hard'</em> meets <em>'Toy Story 2'</em>. I mean, come on, who doesn't wanna see that?!

"_Airports turn people into such dickheads._"

You give me Bateman as a villain, and Egerton as a hero and I am sold. Airports suck so it is fun seeing all the chaos breakout and rules being broken but I wouldn't call this a masterpiece. It's a fun thriller for the holidays, and sometimes that is enough.

I loved this film, from start to finish, if you haven't watched it yet, go and watch it, it sure was a action, thriller, could do with more films like this I'd rate it 10/10_

「セキュリティ・チェック」のおもしろいポイントは、まず登場人物たちの心理描写が非常にリアルで深いところです。主人公である空港の保安官が脅迫を受けるシーンから始まり、彼の葛藤や決断の過程が緻密に描かれています。彼の人間味あふれる行動や考えに共感を覚えることで、物語に引き込まれること間違いありません。

また、ストーリーの展開も緊迫感があり、読者を飽きさせません。保安官が危険な荷物をフライトに持ち込もうとする男との駆け引きや、予期せぬ展開によってどんどん緊張感が高まっていきます。読者は主人公とともに、事件の真相を解明しようと必死になることで、物語に引き込まれることでしょう。

さらに、作品全体に織り込まれたテーマやメッセージも深いものがあります。セキュリティにまつわる問題や倫理的なジレンマ、人間の本質について考えさせられる要素が随所に散りばめられています。読者は単なるエンターテイメントだけではなく、作品から得られる考えさせられる要素にも注目することで、より深く作品を楽しむことができるでしょう。

このユーザーが評価した作品をすべて見る